Blast-Radius-Aware Design for Self-Healing Cloud Infrastructure: Architectural Principles from Production Control-Plane Systems

Authors

  • Prateek Jindal

Keywords:

self-healing infrastructure, blast radius, cloud-native reliability, idempotent recovery, control-plane architecture, reliability engineering

Abstract

Modern cloud platforms run at a scale where failure is the normal operating condition, and self-healing infrastructure is how teams sustain reliability without a proportional rise in headcount. Existing treatments of self-healing systems present detection, recovery, and validation as parallel practices, with little said about how they should be prioritized when they compete for engineering time. This article argues that blast-radius containment — bounding how much of a system a single automated action can affect — is the organizing constraint beneath these practices, not one item alongside them. Drawing on architectural work on cloud-native control planes at hyperscale, the article develops four design principles — detection, idempotent recovery, containment, and continuous validation — situates them against the reliability-engineering literature, and extends them to AI infrastructure, where an uncontained action wastes compute. Teams adopting automated recovery without blast-radius discipline are optimizing the wrong variable: containment, not recovery speed, bounds the damage when detection or recovery fails.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05

How to Cite

Jindal, P. (2026). Blast-Radius-Aware Design for Self-Healing Cloud Infrastructure: Architectural Principles from Production Control-Plane Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 6(9s), 833–841. Retrieved from https://www.svedbergopen.com/index.php/ijaiml/article/view/1548